.claude/skills/psychology-paper-reviewerRuntime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.
以心理学学术期刊审稿人的标准,对心理学论文、研究计划、开题报告或论文片段进行结构化评审。当用户说“审稿”“帮我评审这篇论文”“检查研究设计”“评价方法部分”“review this psychology paper”“peer review”或要求从学术审稿角度指出问题时使用。适用于实证研究、问卷研究、实验研究、纵向研究及常见心理学定量研究。
These states come from the source or distribution context. None of the entries below are SkillVetAI compatibility test results.
These checks parse the fixed package against dated platform rules. They do not execute the Skill or verify task behavior.
.claude/skills/psychology-paper-reviewerRuntime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.
.agents/skills/psychology-paper-reviewerRuntime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.
skills/psychology-paper-reviewerRuntime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.
This command is recorded from the source ecosystem and resolves the registry's latest release. The fixed release shown on this page should be inspected before adoption.
clawhub install @yunyue619/psychology-paper-reviewerclawhub inspect @yunyue619/psychology-paper-reviewer --version 1.0.0This automated, non-executing scan is bound to this release hash. It is not a safety certification and may contain false positives or false negatives.
This is registry-supplied evidence for the recorded release, not an independent SkillVetAI scan. Check the canonical source for the full report, scanner versions, scope, and current moderation state.
The catalog stores hashes and an inventory summary for change detection. It does not republish the package contents.
sha256:40ee3cffd4f1be94fdc7ad7b238ac98eaa3b46469a131bf17c658e769f5a74a7skill-card.mdSKILL.mdInitial release with structured peer review for psychology research materials. - Provides detailed, journal-standard reviews for papers, proposals, or manuscript sections in psychology. - Assesses research across seven core dimensions: research question, hypotheses, sample/design, measurement, analysis, interpretation, and reporting transparency. - Distinguishes issue severity (Critical, Major, Minor, Suggestion) with actionable recommendations for each major concern. - Adapts review scope to match the completeness of user-submitted material; clearly flags issues that cannot be assessed due to missing information. - Offers clear output templates to ensure feedback is organized, specific, and reproducible.