Real Skill packageSource verifiedClawHub registry

AI Building AI Governance（AI造AI治理与安全）

AI 造 AI 治理与安全实操手册——面向"AI 自主开发与自我改进"前沿的治理框架：AI 造 AI 形态谱系（AI 编码智能体写代码、AI 训练 AI 之合成数据与蒸馏、AI 研究自动化、AI 自我改进与递归提升）、自主开发风险（能力获取、递归自我改进失控、目标错位、突然能力跃升）、开发门禁与边界治理（能力门槛、可逆性、监督红线）、合成数据与蒸馏的合规治理（质量验证、内容标识衔接、版权与训练数据溯源）、AI 产物验证（AI 生成代码/研究/模型的验证与红队衔接）、组织落地（AI 造 AI 工程治理、供应商评估、审计报告）。附零依赖本地工具一键判定形态、识别风险、生成治理检查清单与合成数据合规要点。面向 AI 工程、治理、安全与战略负责人，与 AI 治理/智能体治理/红队测试形成前沿延伸。

Identity and source

Publisher attributionzhaoxinghua09-cellregistry owner unverified by skillvetai
Functional categoryAwaiting category reviewreview pending · 0% rule confidence
Package forminstruction with code18 recorded files
Canonical sourceClawHub registryclawhub:zhaoxinghua09-cell:ai-building-ai-governance
Open canonical source ↗

Platform declarations

These states come from the source or distribution context. None of the entries below are SkillVetAI compatibility test results.

OpenClawnative officialProvenance: registry distribution

Independent structural checks

These checks parse the fixed package against dated platform rules. They do not execute the Skill or verify task behavior.

Claude Codepasses structure
Checker 0.1.0 · agent-skills-2026-08-13+claude-code-docs-2026-08-13 · 8/27/2026.claude/skills/ai-building-ai-governance

Runtime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.

OpenAI Codexpasses structure
Checker 0.1.0 · agent-skills-2026-08-13+codex-docs-2026-08-13 · 8/27/2026.agents/skills/ai-building-ai-governance

Runtime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.

OpenClawpasses structure
Checker 0.1.0 · agent-skills-2026-08-13+openclaw-docs-2026-08-13 · 8/27/2026skills/ai-building-ai-governance

Runtime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.

Installation and inspection

This command is recorded from the source ecosystem and resolves the registry's latest release. The fixed release shown on this page should be inspected before adoption.

clawhub install @zhaoxinghua09-cell/ai-building-ai-governance
clawhub inspect @zhaoxinghua09-cell/ai-building-ai-governance --version 1.0.0

Security evidence

SkillVetAI static result: no findings detected

This automated, non-executing scan is bound to this release hash. It is not a safety certification and may contain false positives or false negatives.

Status
completed
Coverage
full text content
Files
17 / 18 inspected as text
Checked
8/27/2026, 10:18:59 PM
Scanner
0.1.3
Policy
1.0.3
3 inferred permission indicators
  • shell execution — automatically inferred
  • network access — automatically inferred
  • filesystem write — automatically inferred
2 dependency and API indicators
  • api: clawhub.ai
  • api: www.w3.org
External clawhub result: clean

This is registry-supplied evidence for the recorded release, not an independent SkillVetAI scan. Check the canonical source for the full report, scanner versions, scope, and current moderation state.

Evidence checked
8/27/2026, 5:13:26 PM
Release binding
Matches this record
  • vt: clean
  • skillspector: clean
  • llm: clean

Recorded files

The catalog stores hashes and an inventory summary for change detection. It does not republish the package contents.

Package content hashsha256:6d07ef1ffef423de48f7cde490e3dc2fb41f9631c55eab7f5536ce7dff1bc464
Show up to 18 recorded paths
  • ATTESTATION.md
  • LICENSE.md
  • manifest.json
  • references/01-AI造AI形态谱系.md
  • references/02-编码智能体治理.md
  • references/03-合成数据与蒸馏治理.md
  • references/04-AI研究自动化治理.md
  • references/05-自我改进与递归提升治理.md
  • references/06-AI造AI全链路治理框架.md
  • references/07-FAQ.md
  • SECURITY_AUDIT.md
  • skill-card.md
  • SKILL.md
  • tools/aibuild_toolkit.py
  • verify/ai_building_ai_quality_test.py
  • verify/gen_security_radar.py
  • verify/security_results.json
  • verify/security-radar.svg

Source changelog

v1.0.0: governance and safety playbook for AI building AI - form spectrum (coding agents, synthetic data and distillation, AI research automation, self-improvement and recursive enhancement), risks (capability acquisition, goal misalignment, sudden capability jumps, uncontrolled RSI), capability-cap model with tripwires and human gates, synthetic data and distillation compliance (quality, collapse prevention, API-term checks, content-labeling linkage), artifact verification for AI-generated code/research/models with red-team linkage, 90-day implementation route; 5-command zero-dependency toolkit